Models seven forecasts, none trusted alone
No single weather model is reliably best, so we pull seven and play them off each other. Here's what each one actually is, how often it updates, and how much weight it carries — ranked by how much it shapes the number you see on the front page. New to the acronyms? They all link into the decoder.
*_MSWX). If you only watched one line, watch this one.OM_HIST_GFS, OM_HIST_ECMWF, …). It's how the
Verify page grades every source against what actually happened.what you actually see the headline is never one raw model
The lines above are raw ingredients. The numbers on the front page are derived products built from them:
Mountain temperature (*_MSWX)
We take the raw forecast for the neighborhood point and apply bias correction — a five-year lookup of how much cooler or warmer the plateau runs than the airport at this hour, wind, and sky. That correction buys about 1.2°F of accuracy at short range over the raw model.
Rain chance (POP_BLEND_RADAR)
A lead-time-weighted blend of every source's rain probability, then bent toward the live radar nowcast inside the next hour — radar beats any model at "is it raining right now."
Pool temperature (POOL_ENSEMBLE)
We run the pool physics model separately against GFS, ICON, and Open-Meteo's blend — the three models that publish usable solar forecasts — and average the resulting water curves. Independent errors cancel; the mean beats any single model past day two. See it graded on the pool page.
Want to grade any of these yourself? The Verify page lays every source over reality and scores it.